If lots of things get said in a programme of events, and nothing is left around to read about it, did they happen?
The care.data programme 2014-15 listening exercise and action plan has become impossible to find online. That’s OK, you might think, the programme has been scrapped. Not quite.
You can give your views online until September 7th on the new consultation, “New data security standards and opt-out models for health and social care” and/or attend the new listening events, September 26th in London, October 3rd in Southampton and October 10th in Leeds.
The Ministerial statement on July 6, announced that NHS England had taken the decision to close the care.data programme after the review of data security and consent by Dame Fiona Caldicott, the National Data Guardian for Health and Care.
But the same questions are being asked again around consent and use of your medical data, from primary and secondary care. What a very long questionnaire asks is in effect, do you want to keep your medical history private? You can answer only Q 15 if you want.
Ambiguity again surrounds what constitutes “de-identified” patient information.
What is clear is that public voice seems to have been deleted or lost from the care.data programme along with the feedback and brand.
We’ve been here before. There is no way that primary care data can be extracted without consent without it causing further disruption and damage to public trust and public interest research. The future plans for linkage between all primary care data and secondary data and genomics for secondary uses, is untenable without consent.
Upcoming events cost time and money and will almost certainly go over the same ground that hours and hours were spent on in 2014. However if they do achieve a meaningful response rate, then I hope the results will not be lost and will be combined with those already captured under the ‘care.data listening events’ responses. Will they have any impact on what consent model there may be in future?
So what we gonna do? I don’t know, whatcha wanna do? Let’s do something.
Let’s have clear future scope and control. There is still no plan to give the public rights to control or delete data if we change our minds who can have it or for what purposes. And that is very uncertain. After all, they might decide to privatise or outsource the whole thing as was planned for the CSUs.
Let’s have answers to everything already asked but unknown. The questions in the previous Caldicott review have still to be answered.
We have the possibility to see health data used wisely, safely, and with public trust. But we seem stuck with the same notes again. And the public seem to be the last to be invited to participate and views once gathered, seem to be disregarded. I hope to be proved wrong.
Might, perhaps, the consultation deliver the nuanced consent model discussed at public listening exercises that many asked for?
Will the care.data listening events feedback summary be found, and will its 2014 conclusions and the enacted opt out be ignored? Will the new listening event view make more difference than in 2014?
Is public engagement, engagement, if nobody hears what was said?